A more thorough analysis of penis envy, which is really envy of the masculine

Now, these talk shows can't deviate very far from the general female consensus, since they would alienate the target of the show, which we know to be women. What we have here is a monumental slip-up in the human female psyche. What was displayed by Sharon Osbourne, the gleefully entertained mostly female studio audience, and the mostly female viewership that runs into the millions (without a doubt), was an anti-male, anti-masculine animosity that is possibly innately characteristic to women.

It's much more than the phenomenon that we know to be 'penis envy'. 'Penis envy' is a misleading term, as it focuses this innate female animosity for the male onto something purely irrelevant, such as male genitalia. It has nothing to do with male genitalia, and everything to do with the hatred and misunderstanding of male beauty. And no, I'm not referring to physical male aesthetics here. I'm referring to the cold, calculatory exceptionalism and intensity that males, and only males, have demonstrated and continued to demonstrate, over and over, that has led to the immortalisation of the male mind as the pinnacle of human accomplishment.

...

You know, I'm glad this evidence decided to show itself, because it's indicative of a very sick, demented and dangerous side of female nature. And it allows us to remember that, behind their pretty little dolled-up faces can lurk pure, concentrated evil. And that's exactly what men need - constant reminders that all that glitters ain't gold.

http://mens-rights.blogspot.com/2011/08/barbarossaaa-transcript-innate-misandry.html

The Global Echo of Violent Misandry: Feminists largely to blame for Norway shootings

Feminists share a large part of the blame for the bombing and shootings in Norway, for creating a situation where Breivik could not grow up in a home with a proper father figure, due to anti-father feminist laws.

Feminists' hatred for males is creating men like Breivik. But as always, they want to put the blame men.

Why no one should ever describe a man as a "deadbeat dad"

The term "deadbeat dad" implies zero culpability for the mother in having a child, reinforcing the idea that women in these situations are always innocent victims and the men are always evil monsters. That's not fair to men and boys, and therefore no one should use the term "deadbeat dad", no matter the circumstances of the case.

In Australia, Child Abduction Penalties to be determined by Sex

http://www.f4e.com.au/blog/2011/07/25/child-abduction-penalties-to-be-determined-by-gender-labor-says/

Western women are responsible for their hatred of men and boys

In my last post I linked to a comment thread on why western women behave like children. A TwoX poster had asked the following:

Why do I fucking open my mouth when I know I'm being irrational? Am I the only one that has trouble with this? Sometimes when I'm PMSing, or just in a lousy mood, I'll go off on someone (usually my SO) about the smallest of things. Meanwhile, in my head, I know I'm just being crazy and need to wait it out. However, I can't keep my mouth shut for some reason, and no matter how much I struggle with it, it just keeps coming out.

How on earth do I stop, ladies?

My response was:

Because you are a woman and you have no reason to control yourself due to your female privilege. When you behave like a child, you are rewarded. This is why western women behave so poorly- they can, so they often do.

You behave like a child, not an adult, and so you do not have the ability to control yourself like an adult. This is quite typical of western women. You don't take responsibility for your own actions, instead blaming them on men and "hormones" or anything else but your own lack of self-control.

Adults take responsibility for their actions. Children do not. Most western women do not. Remember that, "hormones_suck".

See also: http://avoiceformen.com/2011/05/16/princess-miserable-and-the-great-american-bitch-machine/

There's your explanation.

And another comment:

We have a lot of power in shaping our behavior. Feminism, however, is based on the idea that women are powerless victims who cannot be held accountable for their actions. Can you see how this might have negative consequences for women?

I want to make a statement regarding western women's quite common loathing for men and boys. You can see it everyday that most women have been convinced men are bad and women are victims, and that women can do no wrong. For a stark example of women's loathing and disregard for males, check out the women and audience of The Talk laughing at male genital mutilation. Men would never do the same to women, and if they had, they'd be fired the very same day.

Now a lot of people are going to excuse women for this because it's what they've been taught. Feminism has taught women to hate men, yes.

But you know what? I've been taught to believe a lot of things growing up, too. I used my noggin to decide what was right. MRAs tend to do that. We don't follow the status quo just because someone tells us to.

I expect the same from western women. Yes, most western women have an underlying loathing for males because it's what they've been taught - but that's no excuse.

So, western women, you are not blameless. I do not excuse your hatred or your disregard. Most of you are guilty of misandry to one degree or another, and there is no excuse for it.

How to Train your Boy

Have him watch the "How to Train your Dragon" movie, so he can learn that it's okay for women to hit men repeatedly.

Let me introduce blonde bitch and main character male.

Blonde bitch punches main character male in the arm.

Blonde bitch: "That's for scaring me."

Main character male: "What, is it always going to be this way, 'cause..."

Blonde bitch kisses main character male.

Main character male: "I could get used to it."

A match made in Heaven!

Let's see the roles reversed. Let's see a guy abuse a woman then kiss her, and have her say, "I could get used to it." After all, the kiss makes up for the abuse.

Right?

Don't forget, this is a children's movie. These people are teaching your children that it's okay for females to abuse males, and that males should like it! How screwed up is that?

Thanks Dreamworks, you asshats.

The Good Men Project is Evil

As evidenced here.

Casually throwing out accusations of "misogyny" is misandry

After posting a link to Ferdinand Bardamu's article on the Rebecca Watson meme at Reddit/MensRights, I noticed something.

Some Redditors seem to think that attacking someone's actions or views is "misogyny" - as long as that person (presumably) has female genitalia.

Misuse of the word "misogyny" is a form of chivalry, as it shields females from being criticized, a privilege males are not granted. The very act of using "misogyny" incorrectly also reinforces in the audience the improper use of the term, making it more likely for members of the audience to make the same mistake, and making it even more difficult to criticize women and harder to combat misandry. Perpetual misuse of the term "misogyny" has led the average person to interpret criticism of a woman as misogyny, especially if the critic is male.

Thus, using the term "misogyny" in this way IS an act of misandry.

Misogyny is the hatred of women, plain and simple. Ferdinand is not trashing this creature, who happens to be purportedly female, because she is a woman. He is trashing her because she's a bad person.

Is Ferdinand being mean? Sure. Call him a big meanie butt if you want. But to claim his piece is misogynistic not only is a lie but is also quite misandric.

Note how I have expressed doubt regarding Rebecca Watson's sex twice and also referred to her as a "creature". This was a demonstration of being MEAN. It is not MISOGYNY.

You might ask yourself who started misusing the term "misogyny" in the first place, allowing the twisted definition to propagate in our culture and thus barring all criticism of women. Could it be the same people who claim that anyone who criticizes feminism is a misogynist?

What being a feminist means to me

A poster at TwoXChromosomes asked, and here is my reply:

Feminism is a sexist power movement for women at the expense of men, boys, families, and society at large. It assumes men are evil and always to blame, women are perfect and always innocent, and men should be more like women. In short, it is not egalitarian but instead a form of misandry, or hatred of males, seeking special privileges and entitlements for females.

This is easily demonstrated by what feminism has actually done and not the platitudes regarding equality. For example, even though only 40% of college graduates are male, feminists don't care. They'd prefer to focus on getting more women into college in STEM fields even though women are simply not as interested in STEM as men are. This demonstrates that feminism seeks special privileges for women and girls at the expense of men and boys.

Feminist advocates are also well known for falsifying statistics in order to push their hate movement onto the rest of us, such as the lie that 1 in 4 women on campus are raped and the lie that only 2% of rape accusations are false. Feminists ignore all the issues men and boys face, even the ones that feminism has directly caused, except where convenient to appear to be about equality. Due largely to feminist campaigning, in the courts today men who are accused of rape, domestic violence, or child abuse are assumed guilty until proven innocent, and the "family" courts routinely destroy good men based on feminism's lie that women are better parents and that men are always to blame.

For a movement that truly is egalitarian and doesn't require lies to sustain itself, see http://www.reddit.com/r/mensrights

Awesome article regarding masculinity and misandry at A Voice for Men

The damage to masculinity can be seen in the efforts to extend its isolation and confuse and vilify its identity. This is repeated in criminal, civil and family law, higher learning and academia, politics, sports and media. The male has achieved what is better defined as landed immigrant status and taxation without representation. America has become the land of the female home of the slave. Amidst the calamity of a fashion sensitive selection of a masculinity, the practitioner male who is selecting should realize there is only one central question he must answer. Who will this masculinity serve, himself or everyone else?

...

What we are doing to young males is pathologizing their gender. We are subtly planting a neurotic, overanxious confusion that can only migrate to rage fueled by social betrayal. The same could be said for girls when they are later in life labeled as a bitch for displaying aggressive behavior. The difference however is one does not suffer the violence of the state when misunderstood. By the time we introduce gender modifying tactics it is already too late, the child has already conceptualized his identity. We are simply undermining his understanding and ability to express his role, particularly if we remove his father as a role model, or if that role model is damaged by alienation.

...

Male role models however understand the potential for a successful exchange by applying chivalrous actions and are able to illustrate to younger males its value for personal gain. I am reminded of a young man who following the teachings of his mother to protect women, intervened unsolicited on behalf of a woman in a bar, he was hospitalized in a coma, suffering a head trauma. Her teachings did not include his safety or self-worth. Additionally a nephew who on the street admonished a man for the way in which he spoke to his partner and was answered by two blows to the head, the second blow from the woman. Clearly there is a difference between preaching masculinity and teaching masculinity.

His experiences with misandry

From The Ignored Gender:

http://www.youtube.com/user/theignoredgender#p/u/1/dnEp97oV-BM

Misandry kills (thanks government/media)

Misandry and feminism kill many innocents, including men, women, and children. From the families it has destroyed, to the war deaths it has caused, to the men who have committed suicide after losing their livehihoods, to the children growing up in single mom homes leading to a life of crime, and the men and women who are victims of hostility from the opposite sex due to feminism's gender war.

So government/media, please shut the fuck up about tobacco deaths (so you can tax smokers and fill your pockets), drunk driving deaths (rare as hell compared to death's from misandry, and it's not really "drunk"/impaired driving anymore, it's "the cops are going to try to nail you in any way they can whether you're impaired or not" driving), and pretty much anything else until you pay attention to the greatest problem the western world faces.

Misandry.

I don't want to hear another fucking word about Casey Anthony unless it's an analysis of the reasons why a woman very likely just got away with murdering a child and falsely accusing her father and brother of child sexual abuse, highlighting the chivalry and misandry still present in the American courts.

I rarely pay attention to the mainstream media these days because they continue to babble on incessantly about meaningless drivel while ignoring the real fucking problems. And that's just the way the government likes it - keeping us ignorant and easy to control.

Man-hating bigot gets canned

http://thepigmancometh.com/2011/06/20/too-sensitive-yet-not-sensitive-enough/

It's obvious enough from her movies that Megan Fox is the type of girl (I won't call her a woman) who is not only narcissistic but extremely slutty and bitchy. See also the related article about how Megan Fox hates men.

Thomas James Ball Self-Immolated in Protest of the “Justice” System

Read it here: http://freekeene.com/2011/06/16/thomas-james-ball-self-immolated-in-protest-of-the-justice-system/

The article also includes Thomas's "last statement" describing why he immolated himself in protest of a government that is designed against men.

Patriarchy and the low-born male

I would say it's probably true that feminism isn't entirely to blame for the state of things. After all, misandry and chivalry aren't anything new. The lie that women are chaste angels and men are horny beasts has been around for ages, but you'd think in our modern day world we'd be smart enough as a species to realize that no, all women are not pure and innocent, nor are all men bad.

Nevertheless, as so clearly demonstrated by the Slut Walk phenomenon, feminism's myth of the patriarchy, which basically states that women are oppressed and all men are oppressors, has led us to a situation where it's not kosher for a man to suggest a woman do something, even if it's for her own safety. Women can complain constantly about men, but if a man tells women that it's probably not such a good idea to walk around in a short skirt at midnight in a bad neighborhood, he's just asserted his patriarchal power over the poor, oppressed women, and therefore must be silenced.

Free speech is not a feminist strong suit, so when you speak up about these issues, you will be labeled a victim blamer, and by "victim" we mean women. Therefore, you are a woman blamer and a misogynist, because we all know women and girls are blameless and there's always got to be a man or boy to take the fall for the actions of a female.

Kind of like the poor butcher's boy who played swords with Arya in A Game of Thrones. He was not only male, but of a lowborn class, and therefore entirely to blame for the actions of another.

Today, all females are considered high-born and all males are considered low-born, as clearly shown by reading the articles that come up after a Google search for "men's rights".

I can't stop whining!

Am I being too sensitive when I comment on the A Game of Thrones series and point out the subtle elements of misandry and gynocentrism in it? No. Misandry in the media reinforces misandry in our culture and only exacerbates the problems we face. Do we need more "girl power" messages like Arya Stark's arrow in a society where boys are already so denigrated, in a society where boys are already expected to behave like good little girls, while female teachers celebrate femininity and demonize masculinity?

It starts immediately after birth, when many baby boys are circumcized, an issue that's recognized as genital mutilation and a human rights issue of the utmost importance when it happens to girls, but is quite legal and even celebrated here. The misandry continues on through boys' early years and throughout their lives as men.

Only 42% of college graduates are male. Single men are almost four times as likely as single women to be homeless. Males are 93% of workplace deaths. Males die at least 5 years younger than females on average. Males who choose to marry stand almost a 50% chance of their wives divorcing them or forcing them to file for divorce, and a very high chance in these cases of losing the ability to be a parent to their children.

We treat boys and men like dirt, and we always have. (Who went to war? Who worked the coal mines?) Women and girls have always been the privileged, protected sex. (Who stayed home? Who was allowed to live on the Titanic?) It's called chivalry.

Feminism has only made things worse - so bad, in fact, that men and women alike are waking up to the injustices men and boys face. And we will no longer stand for nonchalance in the face of sexism.

Continuing my assault on the feminization of A Game of Thrones

Arya Stark, the young daughter of Lord Stark in A Game of Thrones, doesn't know how to use a bow and arrow in the book, but of course in one of the earliest scenes in the TV series the writers just had to show how strong-willed she is - by having her embarrass her slightly younger brother while he plays target practice by shooting an arrow past him with a perfect bullseye. Of course, he chases after her in anger afterwards.

So the message to boys- Girls are better than you, and all you can do about it is whine like a little baby and go chasing after her, you little shits. And everyone will laugh at you just as they laughed at Bran in the TV series. You can't win. Girls are better. Even at the things boys are supposed to excel at. You little sissies. HA HA HA.

If you don't think children read into these things, you're wrong.

Also, the man they call The Hound is supposed to have half his face burnt to shit, but it seems as if they try to hide it. Tyrion is supposed to be an ugly little bastard too, with a grotesque, misshapen face. But because the series, as with all things these days, must cater to women and their delicate sensibilities, The Hound's injuries are minimized when possible, and Tyrion is pretty damn good looking for a "dwarf". Ridiculous, and disappointing. The TV execs care about ratings (profit) - not accuracy, not honesty.

This is gynocentrism at its finest - consistently catering to women and girls while lambasting men and boys.

Martin's original novel is pretty honest when it comes to the relationships between the sexes, but it tends to have an absurd number of "strong, independent women" with very few weak-kneed damsels. In this sense Martin's original novel caters to women and girls. The only girl who actually acts like a girl in the novel is Sansa, who is the vacuous ditz of the novel. Most women I've ever met, even if intelligent, are not headstrong leaders at heart. Women tend to allow themselves to be led and protected by men, and they always have. In Martin's characterization of women, almost all women and girls are strong-willed leaders who fend for themselves, which has no basis in reality.

Martin also glorifies a mother's protective nature of her children, and shows Lady Stark and Lady Arryn as very protective of their children and in Stark's case, jealous of her husband's bastard son. He does clearly show that in a lot of ways, women care more about their own status than about the lives of their children, however. And that's honest. But with his focus on "motherly love", and lack of any focus on "fatherly love", he perpetuates the myth that women care for their children more than men do. After all, women kill their children far more often than men do. [NOTE: I had to find this through Google search since the government has since removed the study showing that female murderers of their own children vastly outnumber male murderers of their own children. I wonder why? Here is a copy of the image.]

Martin even recognizes false rape claims in the novel, and the injustice of being born poor, due to the evil deeds of the elite. And he certainly understands the complex dynamics of relationships between people, including men and women, as demonstrated by his original account of the relationship between Daenerys and Khal Drogo, which the screenwriters utterly corrupted by changing consensual sex to rape so they wouldn't have to hear complaints from feminists.

I've only watched the first episode thus far, and part of the second, and the show is very good. It's just too bad our cultural misandry has seeped into the series even moreso than in the original novel. I'm sure that over the course of the series, we will see countless maimed and murdered men in graphic detail, while the most we'll see of a woman or girl will be a body, no blood, or maybe a boob here and there. And women and feminists and white knights alike will complain about how the show is sexist for showing too much sex and a few instances of embellished violence against women and girls (a slap here or there), while everyone ignores the minimization of extreme violence against men and boys. And then we'll hear how A Game of Thrones contributes to "rape culture" and "our culture of violence against women," ignoring entirely that 300,000 male rapes occur each year in American prisons and jails, that rape accusations by women are extremely common, that men are more likely to be the victim of a violent crime than women, that women kill their children far more often than men, and that women are the perpetrators in domestic violence at least as often as men, and women are 70% of sole abusers.