Showing posts with label false rape. Show all posts
Showing posts with label false rape. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Monday, July 4, 2011
Saturday, July 2, 2011
DSK is innocent of rape (as was obvious from the get-go to anyone who doesn't automatically believe rape liars)
Dominique Strauss-Kahn is Innocent, and Nafissatou Diallo is a Liar!
Dominique Strauss-Kahn's innocence was obvious to me from the beginning because the rape liar's story made no sense at all.
It was obvious to several others as well, but far too few. Another reason thing are so bad? Because most people believe even obvious rape liars like Nafissatou Diallo.
Also see the Dominique Strauss-Kahn Round-Up at FRS, including a link to an article at the Wall Street Journal victim-blaming DSK. Here's a quote from the WSJ article:
Dominique Strauss-Kahn's innocence was obvious to me from the beginning because the rape liar's story made no sense at all.
It was obvious to several others as well, but far too few. Another reason thing are so bad? Because most people believe even obvious rape liars like Nafissatou Diallo.
Also see the Dominique Strauss-Kahn Round-Up at FRS, including a link to an article at the Wall Street Journal victim-blaming DSK. Here's a quote from the WSJ article:
People like Dominique Strauss-Kahn or Anthony Weiner, who want to skate along the edge of responsibility to the public they serve and the excitements of private temptation, should probably retire to private life where they can take their chances with nothing more than private reputation.
Monday, May 30, 2011
Concrete evidence of a woman's vicious assault? Arrest the man!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13594762
So there is concrete evidence that the woman severely assaulted the man - a severed penis - and absolutely no evidence that the man assaulted the woman. And no, cutting off a man's penis is not "self defense".
Also hard to imagine how a woman neatly severs a man's penis - I wonder if he could have been asleep in her bed after their consensual rendezvous?
Wait, what am I thinking? Arrest the evil man! Throw common sense to the wind, you heroic white knight officers!
Something tells me false rape accusations and white knights who are glad to retaliate have been around for all of time. Women have lied about men attacking them since the beginning of time, in order to get other men to "let's you and him fight". It's just another consequence of chivalry.
Women specialize in any violence where there are no consequences. Whether it is violence by proxy or violence against their children or violence against men, they know they'll get away with it.
Oh Pussy Pass, if nothing else you are reliable.
Want to put an end to women's violence? Donating to SAVE would be a good start.
Police in southern Bangladesh say a woman cut off a man's penis during an alleged attempt to rape her and took it to a police station as evidence....
Monju Begum, 40, a married mother of three, told police that neighbour Mozammel Haq Mazi forced his way into her shanty and started assaulting her....
Mr Mazi, who denies the accusation, has been admitted to a nearby hospital.
"We will arrest him once his condition gets better," police spokesman Abul Khaer told the BBC.
But Mr Mazi denied the allegations.
"We were having an affair and recently she suggested that both of us can go and settle down in Dhaka," Mr Mazi told the BBC from the hospital in nearby Barisal.
"I refused and told her that I cannot leave my wife and children, so she took revenge on me."
So there is concrete evidence that the woman severely assaulted the man - a severed penis - and absolutely no evidence that the man assaulted the woman. And no, cutting off a man's penis is not "self defense".
Also hard to imagine how a woman neatly severs a man's penis - I wonder if he could have been asleep in her bed after their consensual rendezvous?
Wait, what am I thinking? Arrest the evil man! Throw common sense to the wind, you heroic white knight officers!
Something tells me false rape accusations and white knights who are glad to retaliate have been around for all of time. Women have lied about men attacking them since the beginning of time, in order to get other men to "let's you and him fight". It's just another consequence of chivalry.
Women specialize in any violence where there are no consequences. Whether it is violence by proxy or violence against their children or violence against men, they know they'll get away with it.
Oh Pussy Pass, if nothing else you are reliable.
Want to put an end to women's violence? Donating to SAVE would be a good start.
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Adolescent sex hysteria debunked by Male Studies conference speaker
At the recent Male Studies conference, Dr. Marianne Legato, MD, spoke on adolescent boys. She is the founder and director of Columbia College of Medicine’s Partnership for Gender-Specific Medicine, editor of the first text on gender medicine, and founder of the journal, Gender Medicine. Her most recent book is Why Men Die First.
We also know that girls hit puberty earlier than boys. Girls mature faster, not only physically but emotionally. Therefore it is ridiculous to criminalize adolescent males having sex with adolescent females, when females are more in control of themselves. Recall that adolescence is defined as the period between puberty and roughly the age of 20.
Yet even so, they'll charge a 13 year old little boy for having sex with a 15 year old woman: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011/05/study-teen-boys-more-likely-than-girls.html
The problem with the adolescent male navigating that difficult transition from puberty to young adulthood is a disconnect in the timing of an abrupt increase in gonadal hormones that occurs in both sexes at the time of puberty, but which for boys produces intense emotional lability, and high intensity feelings, while the part of the brain that develops risk assessment and emotional control and stability, lags well behind. Girls do not have a similar retardation of that center of the brain and therefore are much less likely to incur the kinds of disasters that face adolescent boys until they are 20.
We also know that girls hit puberty earlier than boys. Girls mature faster, not only physically but emotionally. Therefore it is ridiculous to criminalize adolescent males having sex with adolescent females, when females are more in control of themselves. Recall that adolescence is defined as the period between puberty and roughly the age of 20.
Yet even so, they'll charge a 13 year old little boy for having sex with a 15 year old woman: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011/05/study-teen-boys-more-likely-than-girls.html
Continuing my assault on the feminization of A Game of Thrones
Arya Stark, the young daughter of Lord Stark in A Game of Thrones, doesn't know how to use a bow and arrow in the book, but of course in one of the earliest scenes in the TV series the writers just had to show how strong-willed she is - by having her embarrass her slightly younger brother while he plays target practice by shooting an arrow past him with a perfect bullseye. Of course, he chases after her in anger afterwards.
So the message to boys- Girls are better than you, and all you can do about it is whine like a little baby and go chasing after her, you little shits. And everyone will laugh at you just as they laughed at Bran in the TV series. You can't win. Girls are better. Even at the things boys are supposed to excel at. You little sissies. HA HA HA.
If you don't think children read into these things, you're wrong.
Also, the man they call The Hound is supposed to have half his face burnt to shit, but it seems as if they try to hide it. Tyrion is supposed to be an ugly little bastard too, with a grotesque, misshapen face. But because the series, as with all things these days, must cater to women and their delicate sensibilities, The Hound's injuries are minimized when possible, and Tyrion is pretty damn good looking for a "dwarf". Ridiculous, and disappointing. The TV execs care about ratings (profit) - not accuracy, not honesty.
This is gynocentrism at its finest - consistently catering to women and girls while lambasting men and boys.
Martin's original novel is pretty honest when it comes to the relationships between the sexes, but it tends to have an absurd number of "strong, independent women" with very few weak-kneed damsels. In this sense Martin's original novel caters to women and girls. The only girl who actually acts like a girl in the novel is Sansa, who is the vacuous ditz of the novel. Most women I've ever met, even if intelligent, are not headstrong leaders at heart. Women tend to allow themselves to be led and protected by men, and they always have. In Martin's characterization of women, almost all women and girls are strong-willed leaders who fend for themselves, which has no basis in reality.
Martin also glorifies a mother's protective nature of her children, and shows Lady Stark and Lady Arryn as very protective of their children and in Stark's case, jealous of her husband's bastard son. He does clearly show that in a lot of ways, women care more about their own status than about the lives of their children, however. And that's honest. But with his focus on "motherly love", and lack of any focus on "fatherly love", he perpetuates the myth that women care for their children more than men do. After all, women kill their children far more often than men do. [NOTE: I had to find this through Google search since the government has since removed the study showing that female murderers of their own children vastly outnumber male murderers of their own children. I wonder why? Here is a copy of the image.]
Martin even recognizes false rape claims in the novel, and the injustice of being born poor, due to the evil deeds of the elite. And he certainly understands the complex dynamics of relationships between people, including men and women, as demonstrated by his original account of the relationship between Daenerys and Khal Drogo, which the screenwriters utterly corrupted by changing consensual sex to rape so they wouldn't have to hear complaints from feminists.
I've only watched the first episode thus far, and part of the second, and the show is very good. It's just too bad our cultural misandry has seeped into the series even moreso than in the original novel. I'm sure that over the course of the series, we will see countless maimed and murdered men in graphic detail, while the most we'll see of a woman or girl will be a body, no blood, or maybe a boob here and there. And women and feminists and white knights alike will complain about how the show is sexist for showing too much sex and a few instances of embellished violence against women and girls (a slap here or there), while everyone ignores the minimization of extreme violence against men and boys. And then we'll hear how A Game of Thrones contributes to "rape culture" and "our culture of violence against women," ignoring entirely that 300,000 male rapes occur each year in American prisons and jails, that rape accusations by women are extremely common, that men are more likely to be the victim of a violent crime than women, that women kill their children far more often than men, and that women are the perpetrators in domestic violence at least as often as men, and women are 70% of sole abusers.
So the message to boys- Girls are better than you, and all you can do about it is whine like a little baby and go chasing after her, you little shits. And everyone will laugh at you just as they laughed at Bran in the TV series. You can't win. Girls are better. Even at the things boys are supposed to excel at. You little sissies. HA HA HA.
If you don't think children read into these things, you're wrong.
Also, the man they call The Hound is supposed to have half his face burnt to shit, but it seems as if they try to hide it. Tyrion is supposed to be an ugly little bastard too, with a grotesque, misshapen face. But because the series, as with all things these days, must cater to women and their delicate sensibilities, The Hound's injuries are minimized when possible, and Tyrion is pretty damn good looking for a "dwarf". Ridiculous, and disappointing. The TV execs care about ratings (profit) - not accuracy, not honesty.
This is gynocentrism at its finest - consistently catering to women and girls while lambasting men and boys.
Martin's original novel is pretty honest when it comes to the relationships between the sexes, but it tends to have an absurd number of "strong, independent women" with very few weak-kneed damsels. In this sense Martin's original novel caters to women and girls. The only girl who actually acts like a girl in the novel is Sansa, who is the vacuous ditz of the novel. Most women I've ever met, even if intelligent, are not headstrong leaders at heart. Women tend to allow themselves to be led and protected by men, and they always have. In Martin's characterization of women, almost all women and girls are strong-willed leaders who fend for themselves, which has no basis in reality.
Martin also glorifies a mother's protective nature of her children, and shows Lady Stark and Lady Arryn as very protective of their children and in Stark's case, jealous of her husband's bastard son. He does clearly show that in a lot of ways, women care more about their own status than about the lives of their children, however. And that's honest. But with his focus on "motherly love", and lack of any focus on "fatherly love", he perpetuates the myth that women care for their children more than men do. After all, women kill their children far more often than men do. [NOTE: I had to find this through Google search since the government has since removed the study showing that female murderers of their own children vastly outnumber male murderers of their own children. I wonder why? Here is a copy of the image.]
Martin even recognizes false rape claims in the novel, and the injustice of being born poor, due to the evil deeds of the elite. And he certainly understands the complex dynamics of relationships between people, including men and women, as demonstrated by his original account of the relationship between Daenerys and Khal Drogo, which the screenwriters utterly corrupted by changing consensual sex to rape so they wouldn't have to hear complaints from feminists.
I've only watched the first episode thus far, and part of the second, and the show is very good. It's just too bad our cultural misandry has seeped into the series even moreso than in the original novel. I'm sure that over the course of the series, we will see countless maimed and murdered men in graphic detail, while the most we'll see of a woman or girl will be a body, no blood, or maybe a boob here and there. And women and feminists and white knights alike will complain about how the show is sexist for showing too much sex and a few instances of embellished violence against women and girls (a slap here or there), while everyone ignores the minimization of extreme violence against men and boys. And then we'll hear how A Game of Thrones contributes to "rape culture" and "our culture of violence against women," ignoring entirely that 300,000 male rapes occur each year in American prisons and jails, that rape accusations by women are extremely common, that men are more likely to be the victim of a violent crime than women, that women kill their children far more often than men, and that women are the perpetrators in domestic violence at least as often as men, and women are 70% of sole abusers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)